...and without the use of strange, multisyllabic Greek words. First, a little background.
St. Patrick tried to explain the Trinity with a shamrock (three leaves, one stem). Others have cited the three forms of H2O (water, ice, steam), the three main parts of an egg (shell, yolk, white), or three relationships a person can have simultaneously (someone's son, someone's husband, someone's father, or to change genders, someone's daughter, someone's wife, someone's mother).
Many people accept these illustrations as valid but people with a longer view of Christianity and its history know and recognize the heresy of Modalism.
How can three be one? How can one be three? It can't, you say. Through simple mathematics, I will now prove that it can.
Not addition, though. Addition proves nothing, because where 1 represents a person of the Trinity (God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit):
1 + 1 + 1 = 3
That is not the Trinity. It is polytheism, the opposite of the Trinity.
Therefore, friends, let us turn to another part of mathematics. And because the God described in the Book of Genesis said, "I will multiply thee" on many occasions, let us turn to multiplication. Lo and behold, multiplication provides the answer:
1 × 1 × 1 = 1
Think about it.
You may not believe in Christianity or the doctrine of the Trinity or even In God, but you can't deny my math.
Hello, world! This blog began on September 28, 2007, and so far nobody has come looking for me
with tar and feathers.
On my honor, I will do my best not to bore you. All comments are welcome
as long as your discourse is civil and your language is not blue.
Happy reading, and come back often!
And whether my cup is half full or half empty, fill my cup, Lord.
Copyright 2007 - 2024 by Robert H.Brague
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
<b>How soon we forget</b>
Today is the 61st anniversary of an event that changed forever the course of American history and the world as we knew it. As far as I kno...
I like the water/ steam / ice analogy best and I can't fault your maths :)
ReplyDeletekylie, thank you!
DeleteThis is very silly.
ReplyDeleteTry his for a laugh.
666.
6³ =216
1 is half of 2
2+1 is 3 which is half of 6.
All nonsense or is it?
Adrian, it's not very silly. I don't know what you're getting at (except for the 666 part) in the rest of your comment. Is...a puzzlement!
DeleteI thought it a play with numbers post.
DeleteEmma, what was the question again?
ReplyDelete